How it works

Watch a real assessment,
end to end.

Three short videos. Renee's full assessment from referral to signed PDF; Alix walking through Renee's WISC-V scatter with cited clinical reasoning; and the Report Builder letting you compose your own template instead of being forced into ours.

The entire platform, screen by screen.

A guided tour of every surface you'll work in — using realistic clinical data across multiple sample clients. The welcome dashboard, with active clients and the attention queue. Client management. Session transcription. Document intake from the client library. AI-suggested assessment battery — clinician approves before anything runs. WISC-V cognitive interpretation. The clinical report drafts itself, section by section. The clinician reviews. The PDF gets signed.

Every screen, in order. No demo cuts, no marketing animation — the real product.

Dashboard — active clients, attention queue, today's calendar

Session transcription — live notes, structured summary

AI-suggested battery — WISC-V, WIAT-4, Conners 4, BASC-3 (all Australian editions)

WISC-V cognitive analysis — five indices, percentiles, interpretation

Drafted report — Referral → History → Findings → Recommendations

Signed PDF — full clinical assessment report, AHPRA-ready

Discuss the WISC scatter with Alix.

Alix opens with three modes — Workflow, Advisor, Research — then takes a real prompt from a clinician: "Discuss the WISC scatter for Renee's analysis. What do the index discrepancies suggest about her cognitive profile?"

What follows is the analysis you'd actually want: Fluid Reasoning at the 26th percentile flagged as her clearest strength, a 38-point Working Memory drop interpreted in context, ADHD-consistent patterns referenced against peer-reviewed sources. Citations to The Lancet, Journal of Attention Disorders, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry entries — not hallucinated, with working DOIs.

The closer: "Brain decides. Model speaks. Cortex remembers."

Three modes — Workflow, Advisor, Research

Real clinical reasoning — index discrepancies, percentile interpretation

Cited references — peer-reviewed sources, not made up

Brain-region architecture — Directives, Tone, Attention, Safety, Memory, Workflow

No two clinicians write reports the same way.

That's the opening line of the video — and the question that follows: "So why should AI force you into one format?"

What you'll see: a drag-and-drop template builder. A section palette down the left — Standard Clinical, Specialist Domains, Contextual & Lifestyle, Relational & Systems, Personality & Mental Health, and more. Drop a section into your template, configure its prompt, set min and max word budgets, choose tone and depth. Build the template once; reuse it across every report.

Drag-and-drop section palette — 60+ pre-built sections

Per-section prompt config — control exactly what each section says

Word budgets — min/max length per section, no rambling

Reusable templates — build once, run on every report

Watch a real assessment, end to end.

The entire platform, screen by screen.

Discuss the WISC scatter with Alix.

No two clinicians write reports the same way.

Like what you saw? Get in early.

Watch a real assessment,
end to end.